Hay un Planeta de Ambidextrous

He makes the Night overlap the Day, and the Day Overlap the Night:
He has subjected The sun and the moon (To His law):
Each one follows a course For a time appointed.
Is not He the Exalted In Power—He Who forgives
Again and again?
The verb in this ayat, yukawwiru, indicates that our earth is round. Al-ard kifatah - our earth is ovoid in shape - like a bumpy kufta. It has no sides, no left or right handed-ness, no left or rights positions, "isms" or parties. It is one, unified sphere, it is ambidextrous.
Upon this earth, Allah SWT has placed us as khalifah. Successors to the malaikah who once cared for it, we are the guardians and protectors of the earth. In the past, we were only capable of guarding and protecting a small portion of this wide earth's surface. Before we domesticated horses, this truly was only a small portion - the distance we could walk in a day, perhaps. This is evidenced by the discussions among scholars over the matla' for moon sighting.
In regards to moon sighting and fasting the month of Ramadan, Kurayb said: Umm Fadl, daughter of Harith






Scholars refer to the ittihad al-matla' or local sighting zone for the hilal as the area where people will fast and pray Eid together, and should be less than the area where one would perform qasr in salat while travelling. While some feel this is an exact distance, in fact the best interpretation is that this distance depends on certain factors. In the time of the Prophet SAW this would be the distance one could travel in a day. One factor here is whether you would have to sleep overnight away from home. If you could go and return on the same day, then you were not traveling. Today that distance is far greater because of the automobile. And with the airplane, an even greater distance is possible. If one takes a commuter flight to New York from Washington, DC for example, can one pray in qasr? Another consideration for prayer is regularity and the regular sphere of your daily movements. If this is the norm for you, you are not "traveling" outside of your usual sphere.
Today, scholars talk about global matla' for moonsighting. With modern communication, this is possible. So we can accept a moonsighting from any point east of us, and even points west if they are communicated to us before midnight in our local time.
Thus, today, we are capable of guarding our entire globe and coordinating efforts to do so. Recall that mankind was tasked to be khalif of the earth, not just Muslims. And as khalifa, we find that as Muslims, we are not the majority upon this earth.
Dar Al-Islam
Back in the day, Muslims used to refer to the
lands where Muslims governed and had the power of enforcement as "Dar
al-Islam," and the lands where non-Muslims governed and had the power of
enforcement as "Dar al-Harb." Some, including my Sheikh, Dr.
Mohamad Adam El-Sheikh, have questioned whether these attributions still
apply. Today, many nations have populations where the majority of the
people have "Muslim" names. But, is having a "Muslim"
name sufficient to assume the person is Muslim? In America , many African
Americans choose "Muslim" names because the name is associated with Africa , or the parent likes
the meaning of the name. Case in point, Barack Hussein Obama. Despite the
rhetoric of the alt-right, Former President Obama is not a Muslim. He may
be sympathetic and respectful to Muslims, but he has repeatedly stated he is
not. He is free to be what ever faith he professes. May Allah guide
him.
So is there a Dar al-Islam today? The Middle East , Africa and Asia are replete with
countries where mosques are built and people practice Islam, but how many
states have Shariah as the law of the land? Some have codified pieces of
the law, snippets such as inheritance, marriage and divorce law, and usually
only if it benefits some interest group. Only two states profess to have
Shariah law as the law of the land, Saudi Arabia and Iran . But, in Saudi,
the law is not codified. While this is not really an issue, Shariah is a
living legal system, subject to continuous scholarly ijtehad and application
(qada'), it does make due process problematic. Too often, judicial
decisions are subject to the whims of amirs and political considerations.
Shariah is a legal system between common law and civil law. Partly
code based, and partly precedent-based, Shariah allows for greater flexibility
than American and English law, but more predictability than European law.
Analyzing the decisions of courts in Iran and Saudi, however, raises questions as to whether these states are competently following Shariah law and its Maqaasid objectives. Some the punishments in both countries have been harsher than Shariah allows. The harshest form of whipping proscribed in the Qur'an is for zina, one hundred lashes. Yet, a court in Saudi ordered the blogger, Raif Badawi, was sentenced to 10 years in prison and 1000 lashes. Badawi was accused at first, of insulting Islam, and later, for apostasy, because he criticized religious figures and called one of Islamic universities, Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud University, "a den for terrorists." Such behavior at most is slander. Slander of a non-sexual nature is subject to ta'zir discretionary punishment. If the slander is of a sexual nature, it is Qadhaf, and subject to 80 lashes, maximum, set by Allah in the Qur'an.

24:4: And those who launch A charge against chaste women,
And produce not four witnesses (To support their allegations),—
Flog them with eighty stripes; and reject their evidence
Ever after: for such men Are wicked transgressors;—
As for Iran, the continued use of torture by secret police, reveals the true depth of Islamic adherence by its regime. The Prophet SAW forbade torture because he understood that it produces false fruit. People will say anything to stop the pain, including out right fabrications. More than a decade ago, Star Trek: TNG explored the issue of torture. Captain Pickard (Patrick Stewart) was subjected to torture over and over. The tormentor told him all he had to do to make the suffering stop was to say, with conviction, that there were five lights behind him, not the four that were actually there. In the end, Pickard is saved before he breaks, but once safe, he confesses that he was just about to say it - to break, to see what was not there. (The program is called "Chain of Command.").
What do people like Dick Cheney and Iran's Ayatushaytans want from torture? Causing others to suffer, to watch them bleed, scream, die, what do these sadistic monsters get out of it? Feelings of power - Allah SWT is more powerful, the Most Powerful; sexual-sadistic pleasure - well that perhaps is the motivation isn't it. Why did ordinary Roman citizens watch people gets hacked to pieces, disemboweled, and eaten by animals, on the floor of the Colosseum? Why did the Mexica/Aztecs flay young girls alive and wear their skins?
Is this Islam? Islam teaches us to not even sharpen a blade in front of a goat before zabiha, but we seem to revel in painful and violent methods of killing. And we find any excuse to kill - apostasy or heresy. It's so easy to label. And the label absolves us from having to worry about it; it's justified. Or is it? Are you so sure?
Notice in the ayat above, those who accuse others of something without proof are punished almost to the same extent as those who commit the crime for which the accusers have accused. And their testimony may never be trusted again. They are Fasiqun - wicked.
The point is, where is Dar al-Islam? There was a time when such a place existed; in the time of Rasul Allah, in Madina. But, today, there is no nation where Islam prevails and Muslims are in the majority. Oh, yes, in the Middle East, there are mosques and Muslims, but are they in the majority? Let's consider Egypt. Look at the government, look at the majority of the people. Do they have any religion, or are they like most of the people around the world, worshipers of themselves - enamored by all that glitter, by cell phones and facebook, by twitter and entertainments galore, techno-zombies lost in their own fantasy lands.
Muslims are not in the majority anywhere, on any particular piece of geography. Dar al-Islam exists only in our centers and Islamic institutions, in our families, in our homes. And Dar al-Islam does not come about simply by having a bunch of Muslims gathered in one place, but by the Islamic connections we make between us. Our behavior toward all others is what creates Dar al-Islam. Da'esh and FBI agent provocateurs want you to think you have to go over seas and "join" some group in "Dar al-Islam." I have heard this rhetoric for over 25 years from Salafi preachers, who, curiously, want you to go over there, but they are going to stay here. For da'wa, or for a paycheck from the FBI?
But, Dar al-Islam is not over there...It's here - with you.
Islam is Indigenous
We hear it all the time, "everyone is born a Muslim..." So, if this is so, everywhere is Dar al-Islam.
Islam is the world's indigenous religion - al deen al qayeem - the most ancient and original religion, our fitrah. We are born with innate understanding of right and wrong. Upon this foundation, Allah SWT builds structures of morality, right action, adab-character, and justice. He gives us freedom of will, equal human dignity and justice. These are our rights as men and women. Impingement of these rights by any man or group of men is haram. The purpose of Islamic society is to protect these rights.
Ideally, we would live in a society that guaranteed these rights. Given that Islamic Shariah was sent down by Allah SWT to achieve that goal, Shariah is the best legal code to apply in creating a just government and legal system. Where we can, we as Muslims, should prefer to apply Shariah. In our Wills, contracts, transactions, dealings with all others, we should try to apply Shariah principles. And this we can do in the United States and in part of Europe. We can marry, inherit and divorce under Shariah in many nations including Israel and Ethiopia. In fact, Muslims often have more rights to follow their religious law in non-Muslim countries, than in so-called Muslim ones. Just try to pray five times a day in Morocco.
However, even if the majority of the leaders in a government were Muslim, that would not give us a green light to impose Shariah law. La Ikraha Fi Deen - there is no compulsion or force in matters of deen. You cannot impose Shariah on non-Muslims, period. The Prophet SAW allowed Jews to decide their own affairs under their religious law. The Dustur al-Madinah formed a compact between the Prophet, his muhajireen companion, and the people - both Arab and Jewish, of Madina. The people agreed, voluntarily, to be bound by the judgment of the Prophet SAW in disputes between communities. But, even when he was asked to judge between individuals in the Jewish community, he used Jewish law. An example is his adjudication of a case of zina. The Jews brought the case to the Prophet, perhaps thinking he might be more lenient. The Prophet SAW called for the Jewish law books and had the Rabbis open the book and read the page describing the punishment for zina. They tried to block the text with their hands, but Abdullah ibn Salam told the Prophet SAW what they were doing and read the applicable text, prescribing stoning.
This example is important for another reason. It reveals that legal authority is based on a social contract. We voluntarily agree to be bound by a legal system. When we ask to have our rights protected, we also agree to be responsible for our own actions. When we come to America, and seek the protection and operation of its laws, we also agree to be bound by those laws ourselves.
Under an Islamic social contract, non-Muslims used to pay jizya. This was a tax paid by non-Muslims seeking the protection and benefits of the Islamic state. If the individual served in the military and participated in protecting the rights of all the citizens, then he was exempt from paying this tax.
Our Dustur al-Madina and development of Islamic society during the Khalifaat period shows that Islam adheres to a paradigm that is most respectful of human rights, human equality, human freedom and human justice. Certainly, we cannot deny that some governments were unjust. Mu'awiyyah, Yazid, Marwan and Hijjaj were tyrants. Later Abbasid Khalifs tortured and killed scholars. But the model promoted by scholars, the most knowledgeable of this deen and the most independent of special interest groups, was of freedom, justice and equal dignity.
Such a society focused on justice is a far cry from one based on imposition of power from the top down, for the benefit of the ruling group. Colonialism saps the life out of one people for the benefit of another people. Like its economic companion, Capitalism, which relies on hording of resources by the ruling elite, and the enslavement of the masses in debt, colonialism is based on kibriyyah, on the sin of Shaytan - "I am better than him." The colonialist does not belong to the world, the world belongs to him. He is not a part of society, he is on top, and you are on the bottom. He is foreign, imposed from outside, alien. He is not indigenous.
Islam does not support such a paradigm. It supports indigenousity - the idea that we are one ummah, connected to one another, responsible to each other and for each other. In salat, we pray together; in zakat, we support one another. We build societies, and we become a part of the world in which we have been placed as khalifah.
Some Muslims shy away from talking about the history of a place prior to Islam. They focus on the Seerah, if they are Sunni, or the time between the death of the Prophet SAW and Karbalaa, if they are Shia. Some do not want to talk about the history of India or Persia or Rome or Egypt. Why is their history important; they were pagans. They were humans. They preceded us on the land. Allah SWT tells us to travel through the land and see what happened to the people before us.
In Iraq, long ago, the people of Uruk built a great city. They farmed the marshes and were able to provide food for a huge population. As wealth increased, some had more than others, and some gained political power. They rose to become kings, and supported religious leaders who supported them. Those religious leaders told the people the kings were divine, special, more than human. The kings and the religious leaders exploited the people and grew richer and richer on the backs of their labor. But then the system began to crash. The south of Iraq is a fragile area. Over farming and draining of the marshes for fields caused the marshes to dry up, leaving a great dust bowl. Saddam Hussein did the same thing in the '80s. So, Uruk and its great city fell to the earth's first environmental disaster.
What a lesson, but you have to know history to learn it.
The indigenous perspective is not imposed from without. It arises out of the soil around it. Indigenous Islam in Iraq will come from the dust of Uruk, Kufa, Basrah, Mosul, Najaf, Baghdad and Fallujah. Indigenous Islam in Iran will rise from the gardens of Qom, Shiraz, Mashshad, and Tehran. Indigenous Islam in America will rise in New York, Washington DC, Florida, California, Northwest Arkansas, Phoenix Arizona, Peoria Illinois... It will rise when American Muslims - those born and raised here, those who study the history of the people who came before them, Native Americans, European Americas, African American, Hispanic Americans, and we learn from these people, not just from history books, their stories, their lives, and hopes and dreams. When we, American Muslims, pick up the legacy they gave us and add in the legacy of our Prophet SAW and all the Muslims scholars and thinkers who have preceded us, and create an Indigenous Islam, born of American soil, and air, and water. Not imposed from without by a colonial mindset of ethnic or madhhabistic superiority, but born of the indigenous Islamic understanding of freedom, equal dignity and justice.
Hay un planeta de los indigenos.